What An AI SEO Agency Should Report Every Month

De Transcrire-Wiki
Révision datée du 12 août 2026 à 20:43 par %login% (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « A quick way to find contradictions is to write out your key facts on one sheet, taken from your structured data, then check that sheet against your about page, your ma... »)
(diff) ← Version précédente | Voir la version actuelle (diff) | Version suivante → (diff)
Aller à la navigation Aller à la recherche

A quick way to find contradictions is to write out your key facts on one sheet, taken from your structured data, then check that sheet against your about page, your main directory listing and your marketplace account. Doing it manually feels crude and it surfaces the conflicts that validators never flag, because a validator checks syntax rather than whether your founding year matches the one you published elsewhere.

Two caveats belong next to that number every time it is used. Opollo sells services in this space, so it is vendor research and interested. And business to business brands are not representative of retail, local services or consumer products.

The distinction to draw is between flat results with the inputs completed, and flat results with the inputs missing. The first is a category or timing problem and may be worth persisting with. The second is a delivery problem.

The Mistake That Undoes Everything Markup is a claim, not evidence. Structured data asserting that you own a profile only helps when that profile exists and points back at you. Markup naming an author only helps when the author can be found elsewhere.

One further caution applies to how this gets used in a pitch. An agency quoting a conversion multiple without its sample size is either unaware of the provenance or hoping you are, and both are informative. Asking where a number came from is a reasonable question that costs nothing, and the quality of the answer tells you a good deal about how your own reporting will be handled.

Treat markup as something with a maintenance cost rather than a one off implementation. Prices change, people leave, products are discontinued, and structured data quietly keeps asserting the old version long after the visible page has been updated. Adding a schema review to whatever process already updates your pages costs minutes and prevents the most damaging failure mode, which is confidently stating something that is no longer true.

The monthly report is where an engagement is either accountable or theatrical, web site and the difference is visible from the first page. A useful report can be argued with. A padded one cannot, because there is nothing in it specific enough to disagree about.

This is a plan rather than an explanation. It assumes you have already accepted that some of your buyers are asking an assistant for recommendations before they contact anybody, and that you would prefer to be named.

The output is a spreadsheet and it is the most important document in the project. It tells you whether you are named, whether what is said about you is true, who is named instead, and which pages your category's answers are actually built from.

One Claim Per Sentence Compound sentences that bundle three ideas cannot be lifted without dragging in material that may not apply. A model faced with a passage where only part is relevant will often skip it in favour of a cleaner source.

The volumes will be small, so avoid drawing conclusions from a handful of sessions and let it accumulate over a quarter or two. Also compare against your branded organic traffic rather than all organic, since branded search is closer in intent and makes for a fairer comparison.

This section sounds procedural and it is the foundation of everything after it. A prompt set quietly edited between runs makes every trend line in the document meaningless, and it is the easiest way to manufacture improvement without doing anything.

Days Thirty to Sixty: Correct the Record Take the ranked list of cited sources from phase one and go through it. On each source, check whether you appear, whether the details are right and whether the platform accepts corrections.

What needs you: factual accuracy. Somebody inside the business has to confirm the numbers, limits and claims before publication, because you carry the consequence of anything untrue being published about your own products.

The Types That Rarely Earn Their Keep Elaborate breadcrumb hierarchies, speakable markup, deeply nested item lists and most of the specialised types outside their intended vertical produce little observable difference in how a brand is understood or recommended.

Descriptions of your business moving from hedged to definite, which you can read yourself in the raw answers. Third party sources that previously described you wrongly now describing you correctly. And an increase in the fraction of runs naming you on buying intent prompts specifically, reported with run counts visible.

Screenshots of favourable answers with no run count, which say nothing about how many attempts produced them. Impressions or traffic from unrelated channels included to fill a report. And activity described in the language of effort, such as ongoing optimisation, with no countable output attached.

Citation happens at the level of a passage, not a page. A model attaches a source to a specific claim it lifted, which means the real unit of work is a paragraph that stays true and useful once it has been removed from everything around it.